saʴýҳ

THEATER | ALBUQUERQUE

The ‘least nihilistic’ Godot: Vortex celebrates 50 years with hopeful new version of Samuel Beckett’s classic play

On Friday, May 29, a new version of ‘Waiting for Godot’ opens at The Vortex

From left, Jeff Dolecek and Parker Owen in The Vortex Theatre’s production of “Waiting for Godot.”
Published

‘Waiting for Godot’

WHEN: 7:30 p.m. Friday, May 29, and Saturday, May 30; 2 and 7:30 p.m. Sunday, May 31; 7:30 p.m. Friday, June 5, and Saturday, June 6; 2 p.m. Sunday, June 7; repeats through June 21

WHERE: The Vortex Theatre, 2900 Carlisle Blvd. NE

HOW MUCH: $22.90-$28.15, including fees, at

NOTE: Throughout the show’s run, The Vortex will be collecting nonperishable food and personal hygiene items to assist the unhoused.

The Vortex Theatre opened in 1976 with a production of Samuel Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot,” the classic absurdist play, in which characters wait around for a mysterious person named Godot, who — spoiler alert — never appears. Fifty years later, Godot is still nowhere to be seen. But on Friday, May 29, a new version of the play opens at The Vortex, this time directed by Lauren Albonico.

“This is a really important production in the context of the whole history of The Vortex, because it’s the 50th anniversary of when The Vortex started… and their very first production was ‘Waiting for Godot,’” Albonico said. “That was directed by David Jones, one of the founders.”

Jones directed “Godot” two other times over the years.

“This (production) is also important, because this is the first production (at The Vortex) that is going to be directed by somebody with a fresh perspective on it,” Albonico said.

“Godot” has been interpreted many ways, but often as an existentialist statement on the meaninglessness of life.

“The play is like a Rorschach,” Albonico said, referring to the psychological test that uses random inkblots to reveal test subjects’ subconscious thought patterns.

From left, Tim Crofton and Jeremy Zenor in The Vortex Theatre’s production of “Waiting for Godot.”

“It’s not didactic at all. It’s like, there’s all these possibilities within it. Is there meaning to all this? Is there a God? And then, what do we do with our lives and our suffering in the meantime, as we’re trying to suss it all out?” Albonico said.

Although the play raises these questions, it doesn’t answer them, she said. But directors tend to impose their own interpretations, which fall into two main types.

“Either it’s totally bleak and nihilistic — and, I would argue, those productions are kind of boring,” Albonico said. “Or, two, there’s the approach of, ‘Yeah, it’s all meaningless, so let’s just dance in the ruins of it.’ That’s sort of like ‘Seinfeld’ nihilism. It’s like, ‘Yeah, there’s no point to our existence. So, where should we go eat lunch?’”

But Albonico sees a third, more hopeful, possibility.

“The third possibility — which is the one I see in it, and which I really tried to bring out — is that there’s hope and there’s meaning, but it’s hidden,” she said. “It’s like the hiddenness of God, the hidden quietness.”

Albonico thinks Beckett’s play has much to teach about the meaning of suffering.

“Beckett’s trying to tell us about how you suffer, and how you suffer well. I think it’s all in there, but a nihilistic approach to it will not bring those aspects out,” she said. “So, this is the least nihilistic version of ‘Godot,’ probably, that most people have seen.”

Albonico’s “Godot” will be presented in the round with the actors in the middle of the blackbox theater and the audience seated around the perimeter.

Left to right, Parker Owen and Jeff Dolecek in The Vortex Theatre’s production of “Waiting for Godot.”

“I knew from the get-go that I wanted to do it in the round … (because) that’s the most intimate way you can arrange it. And it’s also the way that promotes movement and physicality the most,” she said.

The two leads, Vladimir and Estragon, will be played by Parker Owen and Jeff Dolecek.

“I just love these guys,” Albonico said. “… I thought Parker would be a really good pairing with Jeff. Physically, they’re very different. You have the tall and lean, and you have the shorter and stouter — which is often the pairing that you have with Vladimir and Estragon. Also, in demeanor, they just play off each other in a very dynamic way.”

The abusive landowner, Pozzo, is played by British-born actor, Tim Crofton, and his servant, Lucky, is played by Jeremy Zenor.

“I would describe (Crofton) as very British, in a loveable way, and he brings that to the Pozzo character, which is very interesting,” Albonico said.

Albonico hopes her production will bring out the authentic human emotions of the characters, which sometimes get flattened in more stylized versions of the play.

“It’s like seeing your own heart,” she said. “… We’re bringing out that vulnerability, so people can actually identify with these characters. And they can get a catharsis in the way that we’re used to getting with other, more typical plays. I think there’s catharsis in this play, too. … You just have to elevate it.”

Logan Royce Beitmen is an arts writer for the saʴýҳ. He covers visual art, music, fashion, theater and more. Reach him at lbeitmen@abqjournal.com or on Instagram at .