Featured
Divided APS board vacates coaching, governance contract. New provider to be selected in fall.
sa国际传媒官网网页入口 Public School board members meets on Wednesday, May 7, 2025.
After pushback from some board members, sa国际传媒官网网页入口 Public Schools won鈥檛 renew its contract with the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), which cost the district around $50,000 over nearly three years.
CGCS is a Washington, D.C.-based organization that partners with urban districts to improve students鈥 academic performance and assist school boards鈥 governance strategies.
The district will instead put out a request for proposals allowing vendors to apply to provide coaching services and student outcomes-focused governance as APS attempts to turn around academic performance as the largest district in a state that often ranks last in the nation for education.
The district鈥檚 contract with CGCS will expire June 30 and applications to fill the vacancy are due by Aug. 1. The board will likely vote on a new vendor at its Sept. 17 meeting.
CGCS didn鈥檛 answer questions or respond to interview requests sent over several weeks but stated Wednesday that it had 鈥渘o involvement in the school board鈥檚 decision not to renew its contract.鈥
APS鈥 Board of Education met Wednesday and was initially expected to vote on renewing the contract. However, it was announced May 30 in a memo from APS Board President Danielle Gonzales that the district would seek a different provider for coaching services.
鈥淭his effort to establish community engagement goals was to be transparent, to be clear, and also to hold ourselves accountable to meeting these specific goals,鈥 Gonzales said Wednesday, opening the discussion. 鈥淚 want to acknowledge that no board had ever done this before, and this was not happening before.鈥
She also referred to several meetings in which the board unanimously approved topics related to the contract and student governance strategies, dating back to June 2024.
However, one of the contract鈥檚 critics, board member Josefina Dom铆nguez, outlined longstanding issues she has had with CGSC in an email sent from her personal address to her APS address. The email 鈥 which she told the Journal was a draft 鈥 was obtained through an Inspection of Public Records Act request.
Dom铆nguez states that CGCS, 鈥渄eliberately inserted themselves into the APS Board鈥檚 business鈥 and that board leadership interpreted 鈥渃oaching to suit their needs.鈥
鈥淜ey decisions within the APS Board are made with the knowledge of only four members, leaving the other three members in the dark,鈥 she wrote. 鈥淭his lack of collaborative governance is evident in our board meetings.鈥
The split to which she refers concerns the three board members endorsed by the sa国际传媒官网网页入口 Teachers Federation union and the four backed by business community entities, such as the Greater sa国际传媒官网网页入口 Chamber of Commerce and the local chapter of NAIOP, a commercial real estate organization.
That divide was on display Wednesday as the three union-backed board members present 鈥 Dom铆nguez, Heather Benavidez and Ronalda Tome-Warito 鈥 discussed the issues they had with CGCS.
Dom铆nguez and Tome-Warito stated that CGCS didn鈥檛 offer enough to help students who are minorities, specifically Native students, and Benavidez took issue with the divisiveness caused by coaching.
鈥淚 would like a coach that is not going to pit board members against each other; that鈥檚 going to foster cohesion,鈥 Benavidez said. 鈥淚 think that needs to start with the board, the board members. We cannot be productive as a board if we don鈥檛 get along.鈥
The discussion over the contract dominated the meeting, which took place among the five board members present. Crystal Tapia-Romero, who has now missed the past three meetings, was not in attendance, nor was Janelle Astorga, who is on maternity leave.
The trio of union-backed members successfully pushed for discussions on a few items, including revising the timeline for student-focused outcomes, reflecting on the contract with CGCS and establishing criteria for a new vendor to be presented to the board at its July meeting, but in doing so, earned the ire of the board鈥檚 vice president, Courtney Jackson.
鈥淚 haven鈥檛 slept for two stinking days because of the headspace and the time and the energy,鈥 Jackson said. 鈥淚 am trying so hard to focus on effective governance, and this has spun so far out of control because of narratives, because of misunderstandings, because of hurt feelings.鈥
She also called CGCS one of 鈥渢he leading organizations in the nation鈥 and added that the organization has a 鈥減roven鈥 record of turning around student academic performance.
鈥淚 represent roughly 90,000 constituents. You know what they want me to be focusing on?鈥 Jackson said. 鈥淭hey want to make sure that our kids can read. They want to make sure that our kids can do math. That鈥檚 what they want me to do.鈥