sa国际传媒官网网页入口

Last month, Algodones teacher Kristal Martinez attended a weekend professional development workshop, in part geared toward learning about how to create safe and supportive learning environments in schools.

Originally, according to an email Martinez received in February, educators were promised a stipend based on their hourly wages.

But between the initial announcement of that stipend and the beginning of the professional development, the state Public Education Department changed the amount to a flat $250, later telling one educator it was because of a 鈥渞eduction in funds.鈥�

After more than 10 hours of work, that was only about half of what Martinez would have gotten if paid by her hourly rate.

Martinez, a mother of four, said she likes to sign up for professional development because she wants to get better at what she does for the sake of her students. But the workshop also pulled her away from time with her family, for an amount she would only find out after the fact was less than originally promised.

鈥淚t was like a slap in the face, almost 鈥� like our time wasn鈥檛 as valuable as we would have hoped for,鈥� she said.

In an email, PED spokesperson Janelle Garc铆a wrote that the stipend amount did not change, adding that after the initial announcement, 鈥渋t became clear that hourly compensation would not be feasible given all the variables, and we decided on a stipend of $250.鈥�

So on March 7, the department resent an email to all building leaders and superintendents, this time adding the $250 amount to a line about the stipend participants would receive. The professional development remained capped at 150 people.

Despite registering for the workshop in February, Lori Spina, another Algodones teacher, said she did not receive the follow-up email and did not find out about the change until after the professional development. Based on her hourly rate, Spina would have made over 2陆 times the stipend she ended up receiving.

鈥淭hat鈥檚, like, bait and switch,鈥� Spina said.

Spina鈥檚 colleague, Wendy Dostart, who has two children, said she wouldn鈥檛 have signed up for the professional development had she known she would only receive $250.

鈥淚t鈥檚 not worth my time, all of those hours,鈥� she said.

Garc铆a said the PED 鈥渃onsidered this program to be a great success based on participation and feedback,鈥� and despite the change in pay, Spina still acknowledged 鈥渋t was a great training.鈥�

鈥淚 am glad that I went,鈥� she said. 鈥�... I just don鈥檛 like the way we were treated after.鈥�